COULD
A PARADIGM ABOUT PARASITES EVER SHIFT
THE
TRADITIONAL PARADIGM OF ECOLOGY?
Posting # 14
Donald
A. Windsor
When
a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, does it
make a sound?
When
a paradigm shifts and no one in the scientific community notices,
does it make any difference?
The
tree question was asked by philosopher George Berkley in 1710. I ask
my my paradigm question now. The vital role of paradigm shifts in
science was explained by Thomas S. Kuhn in 1962.
My
paradigm about parasites was published in 1998. I was advocating a
paradigm shift. The newly formed concept in my paradigm turns
ecology upside down and inside out.
Here
is a brief backstory. My dissertation research involved parasites,
but upon leaving school in 1966 my employment dealt with other
subjects. When I retired in 1994, I was curious about what when on
in parasitology during the previous 28 years. So I started reading
the parasitology literature where I left off. When I finished in
1997 I experienced a shocking realization. Parasite species seem to
be more numerous than their host species. Moreover, the important
roles that parasites play in ecosystems seemed to be woefully
understated and even vastly unrecognized.
Twenty
years will soon have elapsed and, while my article has been cited 197
times, ecologistsists have not yet recognized this new paradigm as a
shift. Maybe they never will. Regardless of what happens, I am
getting too old to ever find out. Here is a brief synopsis.
The
ruling paradigm in ecology holds that our biosphere is composed of
free-living (non-parasitic) organisms, with parasites merely being
pesky nuisances.
My
paradigm contends that parasites are ubiquitous, insidious managers
of our biosphere. They do not merely freeload off their hosts –
parasites regulate their hosts. When competition and predation do
not reign in host populations, parasites take over and prevent
monocultures. The result is biodiversity. A corollary is even more
astounding; some parasites enable their hosts to avoid extinction.
The
validity of my paradigm can be tested, just as any other hypothesis
can. If another planet, or even an asteroid, has life, but does not
have parasites, then it will have few species and have large
monocultures. My paradigm contends that parasitism is a property of
life on Earth. Discovery of extraterrestrial life will reveal
whether parasitism is a universal property of life.
I
hope my paradigm becomes the current paradigm before we contaminate
other worlds with our organisms and jeopardize this test.
References
cited:
Berkley,
George. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge.
1710.
Kuhn,
Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago,
IL: University of Chicago Press. 3rd Edition. 1996. 212
pages.
Windsor,
Donald A. Most of the species on Earth are parasites.
International Journal for Parasitology 1998 December; 28(12): 1939-1941.
International Journal for Parasitology 1998 December; 28(12): 1939-1941.
====
No comments:
Post a Comment